Skip to main content
Registration is now open! Early-bird pricing available through May 5, 2026. Register now

All Accepted Papers

Scideator: Human-LLM Compound System for Scientific Ideation through Facet Recombination and Novelty Evaluation

Marissa Radensky (University of Washington), Simra Shahid (Microsoft), Raymond Fok (University of Washington), Pao Siangliulue (Allen Institute for AI), Tom Hope (Allen Institute for AI), Daniel S. Weld (Allen Institute for AI)

Architectural Patterns & Composition

Abstract

The scientific ideation process often involves blending salient aspects of existing papers to create new ideas — a framework known as facet-based ideation. We contribute **SCIDEATOR**, the first human-LLM system for facet-based scientific ideation. Starting from a user-provided set of scientific papers, SCIDEATOR extracts key facets---purposes, mechanisms, and evaluations---from these and related papers, allowing users to explore the idea space by interactively recombining facets to synthesize inventive ideas. SCIDEATOR is driven by three design choices: (1) human-in-the-loop facet recombination, where users select facets from retrieved papers and the system generates ideas by finding analogies across these facets via the **Faceted Idea Generator** module; (2) distance-controlled retrieval via the **Analogous Paper Facet Finder** module, which surfaces papers from the same topic to entirely different subareas to provide a spectrum of creative directions; and (3) facet-based novelty verification via the **Idea Novelty Checker** module, a retrieve-then-rerank pipeline that evaluates idea originality using facets. In a user study with computer science researchers, SCIDEATOR provided significantly more creativity support than a baseline using the same backbone LLM without our facet-based modules, particularly in idea exploration and expressiveness. Participants' favorite ideas more often included facets selected by themselves rather than the LLM, and participants used fewer free-text instructions with SCIDEATOR, indicating a preference for facet-level steering over prompting. Finally, re-ranking papers by facet matching rather than general relevance improved novelty classification accuracy from 13.79% to 89.66%.

ACM CAIS 2026 Sponsors