Scideator: Human-LLM Compound System for Scientific Ideation through Facet Recombination and Novelty Evaluation
Marissa Radensky (University of Washington), Simra Shahid (Microsoft), Raymond Fok (University of Washington), Pao Siangliulue (Allen Institute for AI), Tom Hope (Allen Institute for AI), Daniel S. Weld (Allen Institute for AI)
Architectural Patterns & Composition
Scideator is a human-LLM compound system for scientific ideation that extracts purposes, mechanisms, and evaluations from researcher-supplied papers, then lets users interactively recombine these facets to generate and evaluate novel research ideas. It operationalizes facet-based ideation with both an LLM-driven novelty evaluator and a user study confirming idea quality.
Presentation
Talk
Paper Session 4: Agent Memory & Planning
Thursday, May 28 · 10:10 AM – 10:20 AM
Bayshore Ballroom
Poster
Thursday, May 28 · 4:30 PM – 6:00 PM
Carmel
Abstract
The scientific ideation process often involves blending key facets of existing papers to create new ideas. We contribute **Scideator**, the first human-LLM system for facet-based scientific ideation. Starting from user-provided papers, Scideator extracts key facets — purposes, mechanisms, and evaluations — from these and related papers, allowing users to interactively recombine facets to synthesize ideas. Scideator is driven by three design choices: (1) human-in-the-loop facet recombination, in which users select facets from retrieved papers and the system generates ideas by finding analogies across them via the *Faceted Idea Generator* module; (2) distance-controlled retrieval via the *Analogous Paper Facet Finder* module, which surfaces papers ranging from the same topic to entirely different areas to provide a spectrum of directions; and (3) facet-based novelty verification via the *Idea Novelty Checker* module, a retrieve-then-rerank pipeline that helps users to evaluate idea originality using facets. In a user study with computer science researchers, Scideator provided significantly more creativity support than a baseline using the same backbone LLM without our facet-based modules, particularly in idea exploration and expressiveness. Ablations further show that the facets benefit the novelty checker: facet-based retrieve-then-rerank surfaces more relevant papers than standard retrieval and re-ranking, and a facet-grounded novelty classifier outperforms classifiers that reason over unstructured ideas and papers.